Example self-assessment forms
Audit and Risk Committee self-assessment checklist (chairperson)
Chairperson | |||
---|---|---|---|
Clarity of purpose | Yes | No | |
1. |
Do you consider that the Committee has a clear purpose, that is also clearly laid out in the Charter/Terms of Reference? |
|
|
2. |
Do you consider the Charter/Terms of Reference still fit for purpose? |
|
|
3. |
Do you consider that the Committee has an effective work programme that clearly reflect the Committee’s purpose, and is being driven by the organisation’s most critical risks? |
|
|
Independence |
Yes |
No |
|
4. |
As chairperson, do you consider that the inclusion of an executive member of management on the Committee has affected its independence? |
|
|
5. |
Overall, would you consider that the Committee is operating independent of management, in that it is able test ideas and ask challenging questions in a free and frank way? |
|
|
Competence |
Yes |
No |
|
6. |
Do you consider that the Committee has a complementary, relevant, and diverse mix of competencies, technical expertise, backgrounds, and skills? |
|
|
7. |
Do you consider that Committee members’ terms of appointment is of an appropriate length, to balance fresh perspectives versus experience working with the organisation? |
|
|
8. |
Do you consider that the Committee has the right number of members to enable a diversity of backgrounds? |
|
|
Respected and trusted relationships |
Yes |
No |
|
9. |
Do you consider that, as chairperson, you have a constructive and productive working relationship with the Chief Executive? |
|
|
10. |
Do you consider that the Committee, overall, has a respected, trusted, and constructive relationship with the Chief Executive and the Leadership Team? |
|
|
Induction |
Yes |
No |
|
11. |
Do you consider that the induction sufficiently prepared you for the role? |
|
|
12. |
Do you feel that there is sufficient ongoing support from the organisation, to build your understanding of the organisations systems and processes, risks, and issues? |
|
|
Secretariat support |
Yes |
No |
|
12. |
Are you being well-supported by the secretariat (e.g., being provided papers in a timely manner)? |
|
|
Meetings and administration |
Yes |
No |
|
14. |
Do you consider that Committee meetings are of sufficient length, and frequent enough? |
|
|
15. |
Do you consider that meetings are being efficiently and effectively run, enabling both broad discussions and “deep dives” when necessary? |
|
|
Effectiveness and impact |
Yes |
No |
|
16. |
Would you consider that the Committee is, as a whole, adding value to the work of the organisation? |
|
|
What are the aspects that the Committee, and the organisation, is currently doing well at?
|
What are the aspects that the Committee, and the organisation, could most improve on?
|
Any further comments and suggestions?
|
Audit and Risk Committee self-assessment checklist (Committee members)
|
ARC member |
ARC member |
|||
Clarity of purpose |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
|
1. |
Do you consider that the Committee has a clear purpose, which is also clearly laid out in the Charter/Terms of Reference? |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Do you consider the Charter/Terms of Reference still fit for purpose? |
|
|
|
|
3. |
Do you consider that the Committee has an effective work programme that clearly reflect the Committee’s purpose, and is being driven by the organisation’s most critical risks? |
|
|
|
|
Independence |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
|
4. |
Overall, would you consider that the Committee is operating independently of management, in that it is able to test ideas and ask challenging questions in a free and frank way? |
|
|
|
|
Competence |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
|
5. |
Do you consider that the Committee has a complementary, relevant, and diverse mix of competencies, technical expertise, backgrounds, and skills? |
|
|
|
|
6. |
Do you consider that Committee members’ term of appointment is of an appropriate length, to balance fresh perspectives versus experience working with the organisation? |
|
|
|
|
8. |
Do you consider that the Committee has the right number of members to enable a diversity of backgrounds? |
|
|
|
|
Respected and trusted relationships |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
|
10. |
Do you consider that the Committee, overall, has a respected, trusted, and constructive relationship with the Auditor-General and the Combined Leadership Team? |
|
|
|
|
Induction |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
|
11. |
Do you consider that the induction sufficiently prepared you for the role? |
|
|
|
|
12. |
Do you feel that there is sufficient ongoing support from the Organisation, to build your understanding of the organisation’s systems and processes, risks, and issues? |
|
|
|
|
Secretariat support |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
|
12. |
Are you being well supported by the secretariat (e.g. being provided with papers in a timely manner)? |
|
|
|
|
Meetings and administration |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
|
14. |
Do you consider that Committee meetings are of sufficient length, and frequent enough? |
|
|
|
|
15. |
Do you consider that meetings are being efficiently and effectively run, enabling both broad discussions and “deep dives” when necessary? |
|
|
|
|
Effectiveness and impact |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
|
16. |
Would you consider that the Committee is, as a whole, adding value to the work of the organisation? |
|
|
|
|
What are the aspects that the Committee, and the organisation, is currently doing well at?
|
What are the aspects that the Committee, and the organisation, could most improve on?
|
Any further comments and suggestions?
|
Page last updated: 5 September 2023