Appendix 1: Questions that we asked our auditors
To gather information about how public entities manage significant assets, we prepared a questionnaire that was completed for most entities that have more than $2 million of assets. We defined "significant" assets as those assets important to the entity's delivery of services. Assets that are "significant" to one entity may not be "significant" to another entity.
The questionnaire sought the following information:
1. Name of the entity.
2. What is the carrying value of property, plant, and equipment as at the 2012 balance date?
3. What are the significant assets for delivering services and their value and valuation method?
Land (including parks and reserves)
Landfill
Buildings
Transport infrastructure (including road, rail, ports, and airports)
Stormwater and flood protection systems
Water supply systems
Wastewater and sewerage systems
Electricity generation and distribution systems
IT and other specialist equipment
Cultural and heritage collections
Specialist defence assets
Motor vehicles
Other
4. How much information does the entity have to ensure that all significant assets are kept in a condition that supports ongoing delivery of services?
Rated on a scale of 1 to 4 where 1 is "no information" and 4 is "sufficient information for all significant assets"
5. Does the entity have maintenance and/or renewal profiles documented for significant assets?
Yes or No
6. To what extent does the entity carry out planned maintenance and/or renewal of significant assets?
Rated on a scale of 1 to 4 where 1 is "not at all" and 4 is "according to plan"
7. What is the value of deferred maintenance and/or renewals for significant assets?
Responses were required to state either a balance (including nil) or "Don't know".
8. What is the condition of the significant assets?
Rated on a scale where 1 is poor condition and 4 is very good condition.
9. Does the entity physically check the condition of its significant assets regularly?
Yes or No
10. What level of reporting do the following decision-makers receive about the condition of their entity's significant assets?
Rated on a scale of 1 to 4 where 1 is "no reporting" and 4 is "regular reporting" with an option to select "not applicable".
Options included the Minister, the governing body, the audit committee, the chief executive officer, and the opportunity to specify other decision-makers.
11. Are there any features of the entity's asset management that could make it suitable for a case study?
page top