31. Internal controls are reviewed as part of every fraud investigation.

Public Sector Fraud Awareness Survey - Findings: Fraud response.

Observation:

Pice chart of Question 31: Internal controls are reviewed as part of every fraud investigation.

70.6% of respondents said that their organisation reviews its internal controls as part of every fraud investigation.

Chief executives (82%) and senior managers (77%) were more confident of this occurring than line managers (55%) and operational staff (47%).

Airports (47%), Port Companies (50%), Government Departments (60%), Crown Research Institutes (62%), State-Owned Organisations (62%), “Local Government-Other” organisations (64%) and District Health Boards (67%) were among those less likely to review internal controls as part of every fraud investigation.

What some respondents have said:

“I do know of one case of Fraud (falling outside of the two years) that was reported to the Police and it did result in a review of credit card review of spending.”

“As an organisation with employees in countries other than NZ, incidents may not be reported to the police where it is unlikely that the Police will be in a position to investigate e.g. some Asian countries. Since disciplinary action is usually dismissal, specific incidents are not communicated to all staff. However, information uncovered during an investigation is used to improve systems and processes.”

PwC comment:
The opportunity for fraud to be committed has usually been as a result of inadequate controls (physical) and/or non-compliance by staff with policy and procedures (behavioural). Organisations should review their control environment regularly, and particularly after fraud has occurred.

“We have only had one reported incident in the last three years. It was thoroughly investigated. No issue of fraud was found. However it did result in process improvements being put in place.”

“We have many checks in our system, but this survey has highlighted the need for us to regularly review our processes.”

  Yes No Don’t know Total Count
Chief Executive Officer/Managing Director/Principal 310 82% 14 4% 56 15% 380
Member of the senior executive/leadership team or equivalent 375 77% 6 1% 108 22% 489
Line manager (if not one of the above) 120 55% 6 3% 93 42% 219
Administration/Support Services 136 68% 1 1% 63 32% 200
Operational staff (e.g. Teacher, Analyst, Advisor, Technician, Officer, Engineer, Accountant) 64 47% 2 1% 70 51% 136
Total 1,005 71% 29 2% 390 27% 1,424
  Yes No Don’t know Total Count
Central Government              
Autonomous Crown Entities 44 81% 1 2% 9 17% 54
Central Government - Other 36 80% 0 0% 9 20% 45
Crown Agents or Companies 64 74% 2 2% 21 24% 87
Crown Research Institutes 23 62% 0 0% 14 38% 37
District Health Boards 47 67% 0 0% 23 33% 70
Government Departments 87 60% 3 2% 55 38% 145
Independent Crown Entities 21 57% 0 0% 16 43% 37
Māori Trust Boards 9 82% 1 9% 1 9% 11
Rural Education Activities Programmes 8 73% 0 0% 3 27% 11
State-Owned Enterprises 29 62% 1 2% 17 36% 47
Tertiary Education Institutions 70 77% 0 0% 21 23% 91
Sub-Total 438 69% 8 1% 189 30% 635
  Yes No Don’t know Total Count
Local Government              
Airports 9 47% 0 0% 10 53% 19
Council Controlled Organisations or Council Controlled Trading Organisations 57 76% 1 1% 17 23% 75
Energy Companies 21 75% 1 4% 6 21% 28
Fish and Game Councils 7 88% 0 0% 1 13% 8
Licensing and Community Trusts 6 67% 0 0% 3 33% 9
Local Authorities 120 71% 7 4% 42 25% 169
Local Government - Other 7 64% 1 9% 3 27% 11
Port Companies 1 50% 0 0% 1 50% 2
Sub-Total 228 71% 10 3% 83 26% 321
               
Schools 339 72% 11 2% 118 25% 468
Total 1,005 71% 29 2% 390 27% 1,424
page top