1.6 Small controlled entities
1.601
In our 2002 report, we discussed the impact on the local government sector of
the extended definition of “public entity” in section 5 of the Public Audit Act
2001.37 We noted that the Public Audit Act extended the mandate of the Auditor-General in the sector, by making the Auditor-General the auditor of any
entity “controlled” by one or more local authorities as well as local authorities
themselves. We outlined the “control” test in the Public Audit Act, which uses
both legal and accounting definitions of control.38
1.602
In our 2003 report, we noted that the definition of “council-controlled
organisation” in the 2002 Act is slightly wider than the
definition of controlled “public entity” under the Public Audit Act, as it uses
a threshold of 50% for control.39 We noted too that the definition of “council-controlled
organisation” in the 2002 Act is wider than the
definition of a local authority trading enterprise under the 1974 Act, as it includes
both profit and non-profit entities.
1.603
The impact of these definitions is that the Auditor-General is the auditor of
about 150 trusts and incorporated societies associated with local authorities,
that were not previously subject to our audit. A large number of these entities
are charitable trusts.
1.604
Since 1 July 2003, these entities have had to comply with the accountability and
reporting requirements for council-controlled organisations under the Local
Government Act 2002, which are generally more complex and onerous than
those that applied under their trust deeds or rules. The enactment of the
Charities Act 2005 and changes arising from the review of the Financial
Reporting Act 1993 will impact further on the accountability of charitable
entities in the local government sector.
1.605
This article comments on the issues and developments that may impact on the
accountability of trusts in the local government sector, including:
- audit arrangements for entities exempted from the accountability regime in the 2002 Act;
- the Charities Act 2005; and
- review of the Financial Reporting Act 1993.
Audit arrangements for exempt council-controlled organisations
1.606
Section 7 of the 2002 Act provides for certain entities to be exempted from being
a council-controlled organisation (CCO). There are 2 means by which exemption
may be given:
- By the Governor-General, on a recommendation from the Minister of Local Government – This provision is aimed at entities that are already subject to appropriate accountability under their own Acts. Therefore, the Minister must be satisfied that the entity’s accountability under its own Act is appropriate for the purposes of the 2002 Act. The Governor-General has recently exempted the Otago Museum Trust Board and the Museum of Transport and Technology Trust Board from being CCOs.
- By the council, for “small” organisations – This provision addresses
concerns about compliance costs for small non-profit trusts. The 2002
Act does not define “small”, but a local authority cannot exempt a council-controlled
trading organisation and, in exempting a non-profit entity, must
have regard to:
- the nature and scope of the activities provided by the organisation; and
- the costs and benefits, if an exemption is granted, to the local authority, the entity and the community.
1.607
Once exempted under section 7 of the 2002 Act, an entity is not subject
to any of the requirements of that Act, including the requirement to
prepare financial statements for audit by the Auditor-General. However, in the
majority of cases an entity that is within the definition of “council-controlled
organisation” is likely to also be a controlled “public entity” under the Public
Audit Act. Where that is the case, the Auditor-General must still audit the
entity’s financial statements where an audit is required.40
1.608
An entity such as a trust or incorporated society may be required to prepare
financial statements and have them audited under its trust deed or rules. An exemption given by a local authority from the accountability regime for CCOs
under the 2002 Act does not negate such a requirement.
1.609
Therefore, where an exempted CCO is a public entity by virtue of the control
test in section 5 of the Public Audit Act, the Auditor-General will continue to
be the exempted CCO’s auditor. The audit will be conducted under the
authority of the Public Audit Act, rather than the 2002 Act. Where the CCO’s
trust deed or rules contain no audit requirement, we would no longer
need to audit an exempt CCO’s financial statements (but would remain
its auditor for any other purposes).
Audit fees for small non-profit CCOs
1.610
In 2004, Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ) asked the Government to
support an amendment to the Public Audit Act to provide that the Auditor-General would not be the auditor of “small” entities exempted from being
CCOs under the 2002 Act. The background to the request was a concern about
small non-profit entities, not previously audited by the Auditor-General,
whose audit fees had increased following enactment of the Public Audit Act
2001 and the 2002 Act.
1.611
LGNZ noted that the 2002 Act allows certain non-profit CCOs to be
exempted from accountability requirements if the criteria in section 7 are
met, and believed that such entities should also be exempt from public audit
under the Public Audit Act in order to reduce compliance costs. We are not aware
that the Government has responded to LGNZ on this issue.
1.612
We have asked our auditors to advise us of any exemptions granted by local
authorities for small CCOs as part of the 2005 audit, so that we can assess any
impact on audit arrangements and gain an understanding of the number of
entities involved. Since LGNZ raised the issue, the Charities Act has been
enacted and the review of the Financial Reporting Act 1993 has progressed. These developments impact on financial reporting and audit of charities. We intend to have further discussions with LGNZ on the issue.
Charities Act 2005
1.613
Many non-profit CCOs are incorporated charitable trusts or incorporated
societies with charitable purposes. They are subject to the Charities Act 2005,
which was enacted in April 2005 with staggered commencement provisions. The broad intention of the Act is to enhance the accountability of the
charitable sector.
1.614
The Charities Act establishes a new Crown entity, the Charities Commission,
which is responsible for running a registration, reporting and monitoring
system for charities. Those charities that wish to retain or gain income tax-exempt
status from the Inland Revenue Department will be required to
register with the Commission.
1.615
One of the accountability requirements in the Charities Act is a requirement
for charitable entities to prepare an annual return within 6 months of balance
date and forward it to the Charities Commission. The content of the annual
return is to be determined by regulations made under the Act, but is likely to
include certain financial information. On receipt of the annual return, the
Commission is required to examine the entity’s activities to determine that
the entity continues to qualify for registration as a charitable entity.
1.616
The Charities Act will add to the legislative compliance obligations for CCOs
that wish to register as charitable entities, regardless of whether an entity is
exempted from being a CCO under the 2002 Act.
Review of the Financial Reporting Act 1993
1.617
The Ministry of Economic Development is undertaking a review of the Financial
Reporting Act 1993.41 The Ministry consulted on a discussion paper on phase
2 of the review between November 2004 and February 2005. The discussion
paper proposes that the Financial Reporting Act would determine only the
content of financial reporting standards (i.e. what must be reported and how). In other words, the Act would set generally accepted accounting practice
(GAAP). The obligation to produce financial reports in accordance with the
Financial Reporting Act (i.e. who must report) would be left to other specific
pieces of legislation, such as the Companies Act and the Charities Act.
1.618
In line with this general approach, the discussion paper proposes that reporting
obligations of charitable entities registered under the Charities Act would be
determined by that Act. It proposes that all registered charitable entities should
be required to produce financial reports in accordance with a 3-tier reporting
framework differentiated on level of income (see table below). The reporting
obligations, including audit, would differ depending on the size of the entity –
small charitable entities would be required to comply with only very simple
reporting requirements. The required content for financial reports would be
determined by financial reporting standards.
|
Income | Possible reporting requirements | Audit requirement |
---|---|---|---|
Small | Less than $100,000 | Receipts and payments | None |
Medium | From $100,000 to $2,500,000 | Accrual accounting | Independent review |
Large | Greater than $2,500,000 | Requirements based on IFRS42 | Full audit |
1.619
Significantly for non-profit charitable CCOs, the discussion paper proposes
that there would be no duplication of financial reporting requirements, and
that financial reporting requirements in the Charities Act would over-ride any
requirements in other Acts (unless the CCO is established under a specific Act,
in which case the specific Act would apply).
1.620
This may impact on the accountability regime for charitable trusts that are
CCOs under the 2002 Act, as it would mean that small charitable CCOs
would not need to comply with GAAP and would either not need to be
audited or would not be subject to a full audit. While this would reduce
compliance costs for small entities, and may go some way to addressing the
concerns raised by LGNZ about audit costs, the “higher standard” should
always apply.
1.621
However, the review does not propose that non-financial reporting
requirements in other Acts will be affected. Charitable entities that are CCOs
would therefore still need to report on their non-financial performance
against their statement of intent (unless exempted under section 7).
1.622
In the case of charitable CCOs, we consider that a CCO that is a registered
charity under the Charities Act should meet the accountability requirements of
the 2002 Act, even though it would not need to meet any of those requirements if
covered by the Charities Act only.
1.623
We will monitor developments in this area and report further on these issues
as appropriate.
37: Local Government: Results of the 2000-01 Audits, parliamentary paper B.29[02c], pages 65-67.
38: The relevant approved financial reporting standard, for the purpose of the Public Audit Act, is FRS-37: Consolidating Investments in Subsidiaries.
39: Local Government: Results of the 2001-02 Audits, parliamentary paper B.29[03b], pages 31-37.
40: Section 15, Public Audit Act 2001.
41: See the Ministry’s discussion paper Review of Financial Reporting Act Part II at http://www.med.govt.nz/buslt/bus_pol/bus_law/corporate-governance/financial-reporting/part-two/discussion/ discussion-10.html.
42: International Financial Reporting Standards.
page top