Part 4: Proposed performance audits and studies for 2005-06
4.101
Performance audits and studies are significant audits covering issues of
effectiveness and efficiency or matters of “best practice”. They enable the
Auditor-General to provide greater breadth and depth of assurance in key
areas of central and local government activity, or to provide guidance on areas
of major audit interest.
4.102
To determine our annual work programme, we undertake a comprehensive
process of strategic audit planning that includes identifying topics for
performance audits and studies. Information on this planning process is set
out in our Annual Plan.1
4.103
The following performance audits and studies have been proposed for the
local government sector in 2005-06.
Economic development funding (West Coast)
Background
4.104
In 2001, the West Coast received a one-off payment of $120 million
to assist the West Coast economy to adjust to the Government’s policies on
the ending of logging of Crown-managed indigenous forests. The community
expected substantial benefits from that funding, but at least 2 high-profile investment failures resulted from it. One of them involved the Auditor-General in an extensive inquiry into the financial collapse of a plastics factory
initiative.
4.105
While the failure of particular initiatives has attracted high-profile publicity,
there has been no overview of how economic development funding has
been invested and applied on the West Coast.
What is the potential impact of this performance audit?
4.106
Our proposed performance audit will examine how the West Coast economic
development funding has been invested, and whether the application of the
funding was effective. The Local Government and Environment Committee
will be offered a briefing on the results of our audit.
Disasters – Maintenance and capacity of flood protection assets
Background
4.107
In 2004, two significant civil emergencies – both floods – occurred within 6
months of each other. These emergencies stretched existing flood protection
schemes and community and national response capabilities. With affected
communities still coping with the flow-on effects, there has been concern about
of the ability of regional council flood protection schemes to protect such
communities. Public and community awareness of the 2004 floods is high, and
there is a clear expectation that local authorities will maintain adequate flood
protection schemes. In a 1998 report to Parliament2, we raised concerns about
local authorities’ management of flood protection assets.
What is the potential impact of this performance audit?
4.108
Our proposed performance audit will review the site management practices
of relevant local authorities, including their management of flood-related
assets, and their procedures when floods occur. The audit will assess the
effectiveness of flood protection assets associated with the two 2004 floods,
and would aim to improve local authority management of such assets. The Local
Government and Environment Committee would be offered a briefing.
Local authority decision-making
Background
4.109
The 2002 Act imposes principle-based decision-making obligations that
local authorities are working to understand and embed in their
management processes, in order to give best effect to their purpose of
promoting long-term, sustainable well-being, and democratic decision-making
and actions. Local authorities also face risks if their decisions can be
shown to be unreasonable, or if due process has not been observed.
4.110
Following passage of the 2002 Act, high-level guidance material was produced
by sector organisations and the Department of Internal Affairs. As local
authorities have developed more experience in implementing the 2002 Act,
however, a need for more specific advice has emerged. We have dealt with a
number of complex ratepayer enquiries about local authorities’ decision-making
obligations and consider that we now have sufficient experience to distil and
reflect the good practice emerging from the sector.
What is the potential impact of this performance audit?
4.111
Our proposed performance audit would aim to provide advice to local
authorities on their principle-based decision-making obligations. The Local
Government and Environment Committee would be offered a briefing.
Procurement guidelines update
Background
4.112
Our procurement guidance requires updating to deal with general procurement
issues and to clarify its application to local government procurement decisions. We are aware that there are other sources of procurement guidance, and that
some issues that we have considered in inquiries (such as sole-source
procurement) have not yet been included in our guidance.
What is the potential impact of this study?
4.113
Our proposed study would update the Auditor-General’s procurement
guidance. Through this study, we would maintain the relevance of our
published guidelines to current practice, and ensure that they apply to
situations faced by both central and local government. The aim would be
to improve the management of procurement activities by public entities. The relevant Select Committee(s) would be offered a briefing.
Rates postponement – Reverse mortgages
Background
4.114
A small number of local authorities are providing rates postponements as
reverse mortgages. This is an initiative made possible by the new powers
under the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002. Legislative, accounting,
debt management, and financial prudence issues need to be considered for
such initiatives.
What is the potential impact of this study?
4.115
Our proposed study would identify the extent to which the rates payment
option is being taken up by ratepayers in the early stages of such
schemes, and assess local authority compliance with appropriate statutory
responsibilities. It would also address arrangements for prudent management
of the potential impact of these schemes on local authorities. The study would
seek to improve the management of reverse mortgages. The Local Government
and Environment Committee would be offered a briefing.
1: Annual Plan 2005-06, parliamentary paper B.28AP(05), pages 40-43.
2: First Report for 1998, parliamentary paper B.29[98a], pages 49-53.
page top